Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Daily Water Sample Nutrient Data for North Inlet Estuary, South Carolina, from 1978 to 1992, North Inlet LTER

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.44.1
Title:Daily Water Sample Nutrient Data for North Inlet Estuary, South Carolina, from 1978 to 1992, North Inlet LTER
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

This data package consists of Daily Water Sample Nutrient Data for North Inlet Estuary, South Carolina, from 1978 to 1992, North Inlet LTER. Its purpose is to establish a long term data base on the nutrient dynamics of a salt marsh estuarine system. This data can be used in correlation with a number of other estuarine data sets to obtain a broader definition of the over all estuarine ecosystem.

Publication Date:2022-11-30
Language:english
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
1978-09-01
End:
1992-04-21

People and Organizations
Contact:LNO Information Manager (LTER Network Office) 
Contact:Information Manager (LTER Network Office) [  email ]
Creator:Vernberg, F. John (North Inlet LTER)
Creator:Blood, Elizabeth (North Inlet LTER)
Organization:NIN-LTER

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
DailyWaterSample-NIN-LTER-1978-1992
Description:
Daily Water Sample Nutrient Data for North Inlet Estuary, South Carolina, from 1978 to 1992, North Inlet LTER
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-d.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/44/1/67e99349d1666e6f4955e9dda42c3cc2
Name:DailyWaterSample-NIN-LTER-1978-1992
Description:Daily Water Sample Nutrient Data for North Inlet Estuary, South Carolina, from 1978 to 1992, North Inlet LTER
Number of Records:13176
Number of Columns:15
Geographic Region:
Description:North Inlet encompasses about 2,630 hectares of tidal marshes and wetlands near Georgetown, South Carolina, USA. North Inlet-Winyah Bay features high quality, ocean-dominated waters and salt marshes in North Inlet, contrasting with the brackish waters and marshes of Winyah Bay. The bay estuary is dominated by riverine discharges from a watershed impacted by agricultural, municipal and industrial development. Former rice fields and canals provide another system for study within the Reserve. The Debidue site is located at the confluence of Town Creek and Debidue Creek. The Bread and Butter site is located along the western shoreline of Town Creek adjacent to the mouth of Clambank Creek. Town Creek water samples -- 33.19'38" Lat., 79.10'0" Long. Clambank Creek water samples -- 33.20'0" Lat., 79.11'33" Long. Oyster Landing water samples in Crab Haul Creek -- 33.21'2" Lat., 79.11'27" Long.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.357Southern:  33.1925
Western:  -79.2936Eastern:  -79.1002
Sampling Site: 
Description:Town Creek 33.19'38" Lat., 79.10'0" Long.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -79.1000Latitude (degree): 33.2005
Sampling Site: 
Description:Clambank Creek 33.20'0" Lat., 79.11'33" Long.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -79.1192Latitude (degree): 33.2000
Sampling Site: 
Description:Oyster Landing in Crab Haul Creek 33.21'2" Lat., 79.11'27" Long.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -79.1175Latitude (degree): 33.2106

Time Period
Begin:
1978-09-01
End:
1992-04-21
Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Research methods

The Daily Water Sample program was started in 1978 to moniter the daily nutrient cycling within the North Inlet Estuary System. The original sampling site was at Town Creek. Later samples were taken at Clambank and Oyster Landing as well. Samples were taken 365 days a year at the same time every day, approximately 10:00 AM EST. The samples were filtered at the Lab to separate the particulates from the water. The filtered water was then run through a colorimeter and the nutrient value peak heights derived were recorded on a ticker tape type printout. These values were recorded into a master nutrient note book, and entered onto a CMS file by the Data Management Department at the lab. The filters that were used in the filtering process were first weighted, burnt off and cleaned, then they were weighted with the particulates dried onto them. These filters were then cooked again for 24 hours at 450 degrees. This was done to determine the inorganic particulates that were left. All data files have since been stored on a SUN workstation and backed up on 8mm tapes at both the field lab and the data management office at the University of South Carolina.

Analysis methods for the individual variables are described below:

Ortho-Phosphate

The basic method was the Technicon Industrial Method No. 155-71W (1973), which was a modification of the Murphy and Riley (1962) single solution method. The method depended on the formation of a phospomolybdate blue complex, the color of which is read at a wavelength of 880 mm.

Sulfate

For this automated procedure for sulfate (Technicon Industrial Method No. 118-71W/B), the sample was first passed through a cation-exchange column to remove interferences. The sample containing sulfate was then reacted with barium chloride at a pH of 2.5-3.0 to form barium sulfate. Excess barium reacted with methylthmol blue to form a blue-colored was gray; if it was all chelated with barium, the color was blue. Initially, the barium chloride and methylthymol blue were equimolar and equivalent to the highest concentration of sulfate ion expected; thus the amount of uncomplexed methylthymol blue, measured at 460 mm, was equal to the sulfate present.

Nitrate/Nitrite

The basic method was Technicon Industrial Method No. 158-71W/B, which utilized the reaction in which nitrate was reduced to nitrite by a copper- cadmium reductor column. The nitrite ion then reacted with sulfanilamide under acidic conditions to form a diazo compound. This compound then coupled with N-1-napthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride to form a reddish-purple azo dye.

Chlorides

The basic method was Technicon Industrial Method No. 99-70W/B. This automated procedure for the determination of chloride depended upon the the liberation of thiocyanate ion from mercuric thiocyanate by the formation of unionized but soluble mercuric chloride. In the presence of ferric ion, the liberated thiocyanate formed a highly colored ferric thiocyanate proportional to the original chloride concentration.

Ammonia

This method was from "The Automated Analysis of Nutrients in Seawater: A Manual of Techniques" by Gilbert and Loder (1977), a Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution publication No. WHO-77-47. This method was dependent upon the Berthelot Reaction, during which the formation of a blue colored compound closely related to indophenol occurred when the solution of an ammonium salt was added to sodium phenoxide, followed by the addition of sodium hypochlorite. A solution of potassium sodium tartrate and sodium citrate was added to the sample stream to eliminate the precipitation of the hydroxides of calcium and magnesium. Total Nitrogen - Total Phosphorus The procedure consisted of an alkaline persulfate oxidation followed by automated analysis for nitrogen (as nitrate) and phosphorus (as phosphate) on a Technicon Auto Analyzer. With alkaline persulfate digestion, all nitrogen in the sample was oxidized to nitrate, which was then reduced by cadmium and analyzed as nitrite. The precision and recovery of this method compared favorably with a Kjeldahl procedure (D'Elia et al., 1977). The main advantage of the persulfate oxidation was the speed and convenience with which it was accomplished. Unlike the Kjeldahl method, which recovered only organic and NH4 - nitrogen, the persulfate oxidation also included NO3 and NO2 nitrogen. The procedure described by D'Elia (1977) has been so the digest could be analyzed using an autoanalyzer (Gilbert et al., 1977). This semi- automated procedure combined the persulfate oxidation with automated nitrate and phosphate analysis to provide simultaneous analysis for total persulfate nitrogen (TPN) and total persulfate phosphorus (TPP). Gilbert's procedure was further modified to use a smaller sample size so that the digestion flask could double as the sampler tray cup (Loder, 1978). Using this method, many samples could be run quickly with a minimum of handling. Carbon (prior to September 1989) Particulate Carbon 20 ml of daily water sample was filtered through a precombusted (24 hr @ 450 C) Whatman GFF 0.7 micron glass filter. The filter was waved over concentrated HCl to eliminate inorganic carbon, then placed in a precombusted ampule and frozen. Batches were dried at 60 C for 48 hrs. 0.1 gr of precombusted (48 hr @ 750 C) reagent grade CuO was added to each ampule, the ampule was then purged with pure oxygen and sealed, using an Oceanigraphics International Purging and Sealing Unit #524PS. Ampules were etched, then heated to 580 C for 4 hrs. Sorted ampules were then analyzed on an Oceanigraphics International #524C TOC Analyzer by comparing infrared absorption peak heights (Horiba PIR 2000) on an LDC strip chart recorder with those of KHP (Potassium Hydrogen Phthalate) standards. Standards were prepared by microsyringing a series of volumes of a KHP solution into ampules and processing them as samples. Reagent blanks were subtracted and average concentration of duplicate samples was calculated for each DWS site. Dissolved Organic Carbon The daily water sample was filtered through a precombusted (24 hr @ 450 C) Whatman GFF 0.7 micron glass filter. An aliquot of filtrate was refrigerated. Samples were purged of inorganic carbon by adding 25percent phosphoric acid to lower the pH to 2 and bubbling for 10 minutes with pure oxygen. The pH was then neutralized using ammonium hydroxide to protect the oxidizing catalyst. Every 5 minutes, using a Hamilton CR-700-200 spring loaded syringe, a 100 microliter sample was injected into a Beckman 915A TOC Analyzer and infrared absorption peak heights were compared to those of KHP standard solutions to calculate carbon concentration. Carbon (after September 1989) Dissolved Organic Carbon Water samples were filtered through a precombusted Whatman GFF 7.0 micron glass filter. Samples were purged of inorganic carbon by adding 10 percent HCl and sparged with ultra zero grade air. A 40 microliter aliquot was injected, via a autosampler, into a Shimadzu TOC-500 organic carbon analyzer. A non-dispersive infrared gas analyzer was utilized to measure the carbon dioxide produced and samples were run in triplicate with means reported. ***NOTE*** A Whatman GFF 7.0 micron glass fiber filter was used throughout the LTER Daily Water Sample analysis.

Description:

Experimental Design

Water samples are taken daily at three stations in the North Inlet Estuary System at 10:00 AM EST, 365 days a year.


Table Structure
Object Name:LTER.NIN.DWS.csv
Size:924291 byte
Authentication:699f0409577b9b8d194480310fed2dbb Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Line Delimiter:\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 DatetransectWater TemperatureSalinityTotal Nitrogen WholeTotal Nitrogen FilteredTotal Phosphorus WholeTotal Phosphorus FilteredOrthoPhosphateAmmoniaNitrate/NitriteChemistry NumberTotal Organic CarbonDissolved Organic CarbonParticulate Organic Carbon
Column Name:DATE  
transect  
water_temp  
SAL  
TNW  
TNF  
TPW  
TPF  
POP  
NHN  
NNN  
CHEM  
TOC  
DOC  
POC  
Definition:Date when sample collectedThe transect identifier stringTemperature of the water SalinityTotal Nitrogen WholeTotal Nitrogen FilteredTotal Phosphorus WholeTotal Phosphorus Filtered OrthoPhosphate concentrationAmmonia ConcentrateConcentration of Nitrate/Nitrite Chemistry number Total Organic CarbonDissolved Organic CarbonParticulate Organic Carbon
Storage Type:date  
                           
Measurement Type:dateTimenominalintervalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeTC
DefinitionTown Creek
Source
Code Definition
CodeCB
DefinitionClambank
Source
Code Definition
CodeOL
DefinitionOyster Landing
Source
Unitcelsius
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min0  
Max50 
UnitpartPerThousand
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max36 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min0  
Max129 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max133 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max10.6 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max10.4 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max9.999 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max31.7 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max9.32 
UnitmicromolePerLiter
Precision1
Typereal
Min
Max9.32 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max22.6 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max38.6 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max16.6 
Missing Value Code:    
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Code9.9
Explmissing value
Code99.9
Explmissing value
Code99.9
Explmissing value
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Code-9.999
Explmissing value
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Code-9.99
Explmissing value
Code-999
Explmissing value
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Code-9.9
Explmissing value
Accuracy Report:                              
Accuracy Assessment:                              
Coverage:                              
Methods:                              

Data Package Usage Rights

LTER Network Data Access Requirements

The access to all LTER data is subject to requirements set forth by this policy document to enable data providers to track usage, evaluate its impact in the community, and confirm users' acceptance of the terms of acceptable use. These requirements are standardized across the LTER Network to provide contractual exchange of data between Site Data Providers, Network Data Providers, and Data Users that can be encoded into electronic form and exchanged between computers. This will allow direct access to data via a common portal once these requirements have been fulfilled. The following information may be required directly or by proxy prior to the transference of any data object:

  • Registration
    • Name
    • Affiliation
    • Email address
    • Full Contact Info
  • Acceptance of the General Public Use Agreement or Restricted Data Use Agreement, as applicable
  • A Statement of Intended Use that is compliant with the above agreements. Such statements may be made submitted explicitly or made implicitly via the data access portal interface.

Conditions of Data Use

The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. Permission to use this dataset is granted to the Data User free of charge subject to the following terms:

  • Acceptable Use. Use of the dataset will be restricted to academic, research, educational, government, recreational, or other not-for-profit professional purposes. The Data User is permitted to produce and distribute derived works from this dataset provided that they are released under the same license terms as those accompanying this Data Set. Any other uses for the Data Set or its derived products will require explicit permission from the dataset owner.
  • Redistribution. The data are provided for use by the Data User. The metadata and this license must accompany all copies made and be available to all users of this Data Set. The Data User will not redistribute the original Data Set beyond this collaboration sphere.
  • Citation. It is considered a matter of professional ethics to acknowledge the work of other scientists. Thus, the Data User will properly cite the Data Set in any publications or in the metadata of any derived data products that were produced using the Data Set. Citation should take the following general form: Creator, Year of Data Publication, Title of Dataset, Publisher, Dataset identifier.
  • Acknowledgement. The Data User should acknowledge any institutional support or specific funding awards referenced in the metadata accompanying this dataset in any publications where the Data Set contributed significantly to its content. Acknowledgements should identify the supporting party, the party that received the support, and any identifying information such as grant numbers.
  • Notification. The Data User will notify the Data Set Contact when any derivative work or publication based on or derived from the Data Set is distributed. The Data User will provide the data contact with two reprints of any publications resulting from use of the Data Set and will provide copies, or on-line access to, any derived digital products. Notification will include an explanation of how the Data Set was used to produce the derived work.
  • Collaboration. The Data Set has been released in the spirit of open scientific collaboration. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator.
By accepting this Data Set, the Data User agrees to abide by the terms of this agreement. The Data Owner shall have the right to terminate this agreement immediately by written notice upon the Data User's breach of, or non-compliance with, any of its terms. The Data User may be held responsible for any misuse that is caused or encouraged by the Data User's failure to abide by the terms of this agreement.

Disclaimer

While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
(No thesaurus)nutrient dynamics, North Inlet Estuary, Baruch Institute, Georgetown, South Carolina

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation, and/or protocols apply to the data table DailyWaterSample-NIN-LTER-1978-1992:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Research methods

The Daily Water Sample program was started in 1978 to moniter the daily nutrient cycling within the North Inlet Estuary System. The original sampling site was at Town Creek. Later samples were taken at Clambank and Oyster Landing as well. Samples were taken 365 days a year at the same time every day, approximately 10:00 AM EST. The samples were filtered at the Lab to separate the particulates from the water. The filtered water was then run through a colorimeter and the nutrient value peak heights derived were recorded on a ticker tape type printout. These values were recorded into a master nutrient note book, and entered onto a CMS file by the Data Management Department at the lab. The filters that were used in the filtering process were first weighted, burnt off and cleaned, then they were weighted with the particulates dried onto them. These filters were then cooked again for 24 hours at 450 degrees. This was done to determine the inorganic particulates that were left. All data files have since been stored on a SUN workstation and backed up on 8mm tapes at both the field lab and the data management office at the University of South Carolina.

Analysis methods for the individual variables are described below:

Ortho-Phosphate

The basic method was the Technicon Industrial Method No. 155-71W (1973), which was a modification of the Murphy and Riley (1962) single solution method. The method depended on the formation of a phospomolybdate blue complex, the color of which is read at a wavelength of 880 mm.

Sulfate

For this automated procedure for sulfate (Technicon Industrial Method No. 118-71W/B), the sample was first passed through a cation-exchange column to remove interferences. The sample containing sulfate was then reacted with barium chloride at a pH of 2.5-3.0 to form barium sulfate. Excess barium reacted with methylthmol blue to form a blue-colored was gray; if it was all chelated with barium, the color was blue. Initially, the barium chloride and methylthymol blue were equimolar and equivalent to the highest concentration of sulfate ion expected; thus the amount of uncomplexed methylthymol blue, measured at 460 mm, was equal to the sulfate present.

Nitrate/Nitrite

The basic method was Technicon Industrial Method No. 158-71W/B, which utilized the reaction in which nitrate was reduced to nitrite by a copper- cadmium reductor column. The nitrite ion then reacted with sulfanilamide under acidic conditions to form a diazo compound. This compound then coupled with N-1-napthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride to form a reddish-purple azo dye.

Chlorides

The basic method was Technicon Industrial Method No. 99-70W/B. This automated procedure for the determination of chloride depended upon the the liberation of thiocyanate ion from mercuric thiocyanate by the formation of unionized but soluble mercuric chloride. In the presence of ferric ion, the liberated thiocyanate formed a highly colored ferric thiocyanate proportional to the original chloride concentration.

Ammonia

This method was from "The Automated Analysis of Nutrients in Seawater: A Manual of Techniques" by Gilbert and Loder (1977), a Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution publication No. WHO-77-47. This method was dependent upon the Berthelot Reaction, during which the formation of a blue colored compound closely related to indophenol occurred when the solution of an ammonium salt was added to sodium phenoxide, followed by the addition of sodium hypochlorite. A solution of potassium sodium tartrate and sodium citrate was added to the sample stream to eliminate the precipitation of the hydroxides of calcium and magnesium. Total Nitrogen - Total Phosphorus The procedure consisted of an alkaline persulfate oxidation followed by automated analysis for nitrogen (as nitrate) and phosphorus (as phosphate) on a Technicon Auto Analyzer. With alkaline persulfate digestion, all nitrogen in the sample was oxidized to nitrate, which was then reduced by cadmium and analyzed as nitrite. The precision and recovery of this method compared favorably with a Kjeldahl procedure (D'Elia et al., 1977). The main advantage of the persulfate oxidation was the speed and convenience with which it was accomplished. Unlike the Kjeldahl method, which recovered only organic and NH4 - nitrogen, the persulfate oxidation also included NO3 and NO2 nitrogen. The procedure described by D'Elia (1977) has been so the digest could be analyzed using an autoanalyzer (Gilbert et al., 1977). This semi- automated procedure combined the persulfate oxidation with automated nitrate and phosphate analysis to provide simultaneous analysis for total persulfate nitrogen (TPN) and total persulfate phosphorus (TPP). Gilbert's procedure was further modified to use a smaller sample size so that the digestion flask could double as the sampler tray cup (Loder, 1978). Using this method, many samples could be run quickly with a minimum of handling. Carbon (prior to September 1989) Particulate Carbon 20 ml of daily water sample was filtered through a precombusted (24 hr @ 450 C) Whatman GFF 0.7 micron glass filter. The filter was waved over concentrated HCl to eliminate inorganic carbon, then placed in a precombusted ampule and frozen. Batches were dried at 60 C for 48 hrs. 0.1 gr of precombusted (48 hr @ 750 C) reagent grade CuO was added to each ampule, the ampule was then purged with pure oxygen and sealed, using an Oceanigraphics International Purging and Sealing Unit #524PS. Ampules were etched, then heated to 580 C for 4 hrs. Sorted ampules were then analyzed on an Oceanigraphics International #524C TOC Analyzer by comparing infrared absorption peak heights (Horiba PIR 2000) on an LDC strip chart recorder with those of KHP (Potassium Hydrogen Phthalate) standards. Standards were prepared by microsyringing a series of volumes of a KHP solution into ampules and processing them as samples. Reagent blanks were subtracted and average concentration of duplicate samples was calculated for each DWS site. Dissolved Organic Carbon The daily water sample was filtered through a precombusted (24 hr @ 450 C) Whatman GFF 0.7 micron glass filter. An aliquot of filtrate was refrigerated. Samples were purged of inorganic carbon by adding 25percent phosphoric acid to lower the pH to 2 and bubbling for 10 minutes with pure oxygen. The pH was then neutralized using ammonium hydroxide to protect the oxidizing catalyst. Every 5 minutes, using a Hamilton CR-700-200 spring loaded syringe, a 100 microliter sample was injected into a Beckman 915A TOC Analyzer and infrared absorption peak heights were compared to those of KHP standard solutions to calculate carbon concentration. Carbon (after September 1989) Dissolved Organic Carbon Water samples were filtered through a precombusted Whatman GFF 7.0 micron glass filter. Samples were purged of inorganic carbon by adding 10 percent HCl and sparged with ultra zero grade air. A 40 microliter aliquot was injected, via a autosampler, into a Shimadzu TOC-500 organic carbon analyzer. A non-dispersive infrared gas analyzer was utilized to measure the carbon dioxide produced and samples were run in triplicate with means reported. ***NOTE*** A Whatman GFF 7.0 micron glass fiber filter was used throughout the LTER Daily Water Sample analysis.

Description:

Experimental Design

Water samples are taken daily at three stations in the North Inlet Estuary System at 10:00 AM EST, 365 days a year.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@edirepository.org
Web Address:
https://edirepository.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual:Dr. F. John Vernberg
Organization:North Inlet LTER
Individual:Dr. Elizabeth Blood
Organization:North Inlet LTER
Organization:NIN-LTER
Contacts:
Organization:LTER Network Office
Position:LNO Information Manager
Position:Information Manager
Organization:LTER Network Office
Address:
UNM Biology Department, MSC03-2020,
1 University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 USA
Phone:
505 277 2535 (voice)
Phone:
505 277 2541 (fax)
Email Address:
tech-support@lternet.edu
Web Address:
http://www.lternet.edu
Metadata Providers:
Organization:LTER Network Office
Address:
UNM Biology Department, MSC03-2020,
1 University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 USA
Phone:
505 277 2535 (voice)
Phone:
505 277 2541 (fax)
Email Address:
tech-support@lternet.edu
Web Address:
http://www.lternet.edu

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1978-09-01
End:
1992-04-21
Geographic Region:
Description:North Inlet encompasses about 2,630 hectares of tidal marshes and wetlands near Georgetown, South Carolina, USA. North Inlet-Winyah Bay features high quality, ocean-dominated waters and salt marshes in North Inlet, contrasting with the brackish waters and marshes of Winyah Bay. The bay estuary is dominated by riverine discharges from a watershed impacted by agricultural, municipal and industrial development. Former rice fields and canals provide another system for study within the Reserve. The Debidue site is located at the confluence of Town Creek and Debidue Creek. The Bread and Butter site is located along the western shoreline of Town Creek adjacent to the mouth of Clambank Creek. Town Creek water samples -- 33.19'38" Lat., 79.10'0" Long. Clambank Creek water samples -- 33.20'0" Lat., 79.11'33" Long. Oyster Landing water samples in Crab Haul Creek -- 33.21'2" Lat., 79.11'27" Long.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.357Southern:  33.1925
Western:  -79.2936Eastern:  -79.1002

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to Data Table: DailyWaterSample-NIN-LTER-1978-1992


Time Period
Begin:
1978-09-01
End:
1992-04-21
Geographic Region:
Description:North Inlet encompasses about 2,630 hectares of tidal marshes and wetlands near Georgetown, South Carolina, USA. North Inlet-Winyah Bay features high quality, ocean-dominated waters and salt marshes in North Inlet, contrasting with the brackish waters and marshes of Winyah Bay. The bay estuary is dominated by riverine discharges from a watershed impacted by agricultural, municipal and industrial development. Former rice fields and canals provide another system for study within the Reserve. The Debidue site is located at the confluence of Town Creek and Debidue Creek. The Bread and Butter site is located along the western shoreline of Town Creek adjacent to the mouth of Clambank Creek. Town Creek water samples -- 33.19'38" Lat., 79.10'0" Long. Clambank Creek water samples -- 33.20'0" Lat., 79.11'33" Long. Oyster Landing water samples in Crab Haul Creek -- 33.21'2" Lat., 79.11'27" Long.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.357Southern:  33.1925
Western:  -79.2936Eastern:  -79.1002
Sampling Site: 
Description:Town Creek 33.19'38" Lat., 79.10'0" Long.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -79.1000Latitude (degree): 33.2005
Sampling Site: 
Description:Clambank Creek 33.20'0" Lat., 79.11'33" Long.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -79.1192Latitude (degree): 33.2000
Sampling Site: 
Description:Oyster Landing in Crab Haul Creek 33.21'2" Lat., 79.11'27" Long.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -79.1175Latitude (degree): 33.2106

Project

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:

Entry verification

Known Nutrient parameters are entered into a "Raw Nutrient Run Book" for every tray of samples that are run. This book contains parameters, and pertinent notes associated with each tray. The following parameters are in the "Raw Nutrient Run Book": Tray Number Chemistry Std. Cup.# Std. Cal.# Dummy Std. Conc. Sample Chem.# (sample ID) Drift Dilution This book is basically a NOTE book for the chemist running the samples. When a tray is run, raw peak height numbers are written onto the ticker tape or printout, which is kept in the chemistry lab. This data is hand copied into a "Master Nutrient Raw Peak Height Book". ** NOTE ** (There is no re-editing of the data that is written into the "Master Nutrient Raw Peak Height Book".) The ticker tape and "Raw Nutrient Run Book" are kept in the fire proof cabinet at the Baruch Marine Lab, Georgetown, SC. A "Nutrient Parameter Book" and the "Master Nurtient Raw Peak Height Book" are kept in the chemistry lab at the Baruch Marine Lab, Georgetown SC. The following data is in the "Nutrient Parameter Book": Tray# Average Peak Height of standard Cups Oxidizer Reagent Blank Drift Standard Concentration This book is necessary to run the correction programs. At this point, a Data Manager entered the information from the "Master Nutrient Raw Peak Height Book" into a CMS file. This data, once entered was verified for typographical errors by the Data Manager.

Date of last update while at North Inlet LTER

October 1992

Last modification at LTER Network Office

Individual data files (LTER.NIN.DWS.1978.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1979.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1980.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1981.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1982.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1983.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1984.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1985.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1986.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1987.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1988.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1989.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1990.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1991.txt, LTER.NIN.DWS.1992.txt) were concatenated into a single file spanning the dates from 1978 to 1992. Original fixed column format was changed to comma separated value format. These changes occured in March 2012

Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:unitList')
        |     |     |  \___attribute 'schemaLocation' in ns 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' ('xsi:schemaLocation') = 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1 http://nis.lternet.edu/schemas/eml/eml-2.1.0/stmml.xsd'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:unit')
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = 'ppt'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'constantToSI' = '0'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'partPerThousand'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '0.001'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'partPerThousand'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'numberPerNumber'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'dimensionless'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:description')
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'ratio of two quantities as parts per thousand\n            (1:1000)'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:unit')
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = 'μmol/L'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'constantToSI' = '0'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'micromolePerLiter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '0.001'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'micromolePerLiter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'molePerMeterCubed'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'amountOfSubstanceConcentration'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:description')
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'concentration, same magnitude as micromolar (for a dissolved\n            constituent)'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo