Data Package Metadata   View Summary

LTER Epibenthos Sampling Data for North Inlet Estuary, Georgetown, South Carolina from 1981 to 1992, North Inlet LTER

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-nin.7.1
Title:LTER Epibenthos Sampling Data for North Inlet Estuary, Georgetown, South Carolina from 1981 to 1992, North Inlet LTER
Alternate Identifier:EPI
Abstract:

This data package consists of Epibenthos Sampling for North Inlet Stations Bread and Butter Creek, from 1981 to 1992, and Debidue Creek from 1981 to 1984, The purpose of the long term monitoring of Epibenthos was to determine seasonal and inter-annual changes in the taxonomic/life stage composition and abundance of small motile epibenthic invertebrates and fishes (1-20 mm in length) in the major sub- tidal habitats of North Inlet estuary.

Publication Date:2006
Language:english

Time Period
Begin:
1981-01-12
End:
1992-01-17

People and Organizations
Contact:Information Manager (LTER Network Office) [  email ]
Contact:Information Manager (LTER Network Office) [  email ]
Creator:Allen, Dennis 

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
epibenthos-NIN-LTER-1981-1992
Description:
LTER Epibenthos Sampling Data for North Inlet Estuary, Georgetown, South Carolina from 1981 to 1992, North Inlet LTER
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-d.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-nin/7/1/d4a717eab7a699112ce3ca4cd1a2aabf
Name:epibenthos-NIN-LTER-1981-1992
Description:LTER Epibenthos Sampling Data for North Inlet Estuary, Georgetown, South Carolina from 1981 to 1992, North Inlet LTER
Number of Records:1105
Number of Columns:56
Geographic Region:
Description:The North Inlet Estuary is located on the southeastern coast of the United States, approximately 10 kilometers east of Georgetown, South Carolina. The North Inlet Estuary is a bar-built Class C type estuary (Pritchard, 1955) and is a relatively small tidal estuary (area = 2630 hectares). It is composed of numerous winding tidal creeks dominated by Spartina alterniflora and is considered a pristine tidal estuary due to minimal anthropogenic impacts. The watershed drains a 24.8 square kilometer area of mostly pine forest and a moderately developed residential watershed to the north. Town Creek is a high salinity creek dominated by semi-diurnal tides. Rain input, primarily runoff, depresses salinities briefly (hours - days) depending on duration and frequency. Water temperatures mirror local air conditions: warm temperate. The DD (Debidue) site near Town Creek mouth and the Inlet is characterized by a high energy sandy bottom with regular ridges and swales. Depth along the tow path averaged 3 to 4 meters at sampling time. The bottom is sand with little or no hard substrate (shell, rock). Seasonal growths of bryozoan and algae occur. Generally, little or no organic matter is collected in the epibenthic sled. The DD epibenthos tow path site was located at the confluence of Town Creek and Debidue Creek. The 100 m tow path followed a transect beginning at a fixed point on Debidue Island and followed the shoreline due south (approximately 5 meters from shore) in line with a large, heavily-vegetated dune on North Island. The tow path terminated on a line with the boilers of a sunken ship and the tip of Debidue Island (looking to the NE). Each tow lasted approximately 5 minutes depending on tidal velocity. The BB (Bread and Butter) site is located along Town Creek approximately 2 km from the inlet mouth. At this location the creek is bounded by extensive Spartina alterniflora marshes. The intertidal zone is covered by clusters of the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), shell rubble and intermittent muddy flats. The bottom supports seasonal growths of sponges, algae, hydroids, bryozoans, and soft corals, as well as, oysters. Much of the bottom habitat is sandy mud covered by varying accumulations of detrital plant and fecal material. Depth along the tow path ranges from 2 to 4 meters at sampling time. The BB epibenthos tow path site is located along the western shoreline of Town Creek adjacent to the mouth of Clambank Creek. Each of the tows began at a small (1 m wide) drainage creek about 50m south of Clambank Creek confluence. The tow was started about 5 m from the edge of the marsh and ended about 30 m from the edge of the marsh. The tow path extended to a line between the Clambank tower and the first small drainage southwest of Boze's Creek mouth. Each tow lasted approximately 5 minutes depending upon tidal velocity.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.357Southern:  33.2125
Western:  -79.2936Eastern:  -79.1042

Time Period
Begin:
1981-01-12
End:
1992-01-17
Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Experimental Design

Since previous field studies indicated that stage of tide and time of day affected organism abundance at the epibenthic sled stations, it was necessary to make collections about every 14 days when the same tide stage occurs at the same time of day to keep these variables "constant". Thus, three sequential tows were made with the same apparatus along the same tow path when the end of the ebbing tide occurred near noon. Replicated biweekly measurements were made to allow for statistical comparisons of means among dates. Comparisons of abundance between years provided information on long term trends. Collections at a sandy inlet and a major marsh creek location allowed for a comparison of two habitat types. The same gear, field deployment, and tow paths have been used since sample no. 1.

Research Methods

Field Collection

A series of three sequential tows were made at each of 2 stations at two week intervals 2 1/2 hours prior to low tide. All collections were made during the late morning (9 - 11 am) hours. An epibenthic sled (see description) was towed behind an outboard boat motoring approximately 2 knots faster than the ebbing tidal current. All tows were made moving with the tidal flow along a marked tow path 100 m in length. Tows usually lasted approx. 5 minutes depending upon tidal velocity. Volume of water filtered was estimated with a torpedo shaped General Oceanics flow meter model 2040 mounted in the mouth of the net. Flow meter readings are recorded before and after each tow. Upon sample retrieval, the contents of the net were concentrated in the removable cod end and transferred into pre-labeled Nalgene jars and 100% buffered formalin stained with Rose Bengal added to bring the final concentration to 5 - 10% formalin. In the event of a large catch of sponge, algae, shell, or an oversized organism (greater than or equal to 1 liter volume), the sample was poured into a bucket and the excess material rinsed, noted, and discarded. The remaining sample was then sieved through a fine mesh net (less than or equal to 365 micron), placed in a pre-labeled jar, and preserved. Samples were returned to the lab for analysis.

Gear Description

Epibenthic Sled:

The apparatus consists of a rectangular steel frame (51 X 30 cm) mounted on 3 skis which orient the mouth of a #2 (365 micron) Nitex, 1/2 m mouth diameter standard conical plankton net perpendicular to the creek bottom. The apparatus does not dig into the sediment, but does collect soft-bodied sessile invertebrates (sponges, bryozoans, etc.) in addition to small motile organisms within 30 cm of the bottom. A 12m tow rope tied to the leading point of the sled chassis allowed for the best contact between the skis and the bottom along most of the tow paths.

Lab Analysis

Prior to counting, the sample is sieved, rinsed with fresh water and the used formalin disposed. The rinsed sample is then placed in a graduated beaker and sample volume recorded. In the event the volume of settled material is excessive (greater than or equal to 100 ml) the sample is divided with a cylindrical splitting apparatus until a workable fraction is obtained (never less than 12.5% of original volume). Sorting is done under a binocular dissecting microscope at 60 - 120X. All organisms of appropriate size (greater than or equal to 365 micron) are enumerated. (See Epibenthos Sample Information sheet and "Epibenthos Full Screen Management Program" for a listing of common taxa and all taxa encountered , respectively.) During the first year (1/20/81-1/9/82), 100 of each species of mysids; decapod larvae, juveniles, and adults; cumaceans; stomatopods; isopods; fish eggs, larvae, and juveniles (up to 100 per species per replicate) and rare organisms were isolated. All isolated specimens were stored by appropriate taxon in labeled flint vials and preserved in 10% formalin buffered and stained with Rose Bengal. Vials were stored by station and cruise for future analysis and reference. From 1/21/84 - 1/4/85, up to 100 of each species of fish larvae were isolated from each station. The first 100 encountered in replicates A, B, or C were in label vials and stored until length measurements were made. Larvae were measured using vernier calipers for larger specimens (> or = 10mm) or an ocular micrometer for small specimens(less or equare to 10mm). Lengths were recorded to the nearest .1mm with the ocular micrometer. Following sorting and enumeration the counted sample was recombined with the unsorted portion, placed in a labeled 500 ml flint jar, preserved with a fresh, buffered and stained 10% formalin solution and stored for future reference.

Counts

Counting sheets underwent three revisions as we become more familiar with the taxa and their relative abundance/importance over time. Copies of counting sheets used during different periods are in this documentation. The original sheet was used through cruise no. 99 the end of the first 4 years. Notes on taxonomy and life history were written on these sheets for the record. A simplified sheet with fewer categories and no entry slots for life history stages/sex was used for cruises 100-145 to speed up processing tissue. When analysis of data showed that much was lost in lumping genera and species into more general categories, and when time became available, reprocessing of those samples was done to upgrade the data base. See item 25 for details. The final counting sheet (145-present) was consistent with the IBM full screen manager. It includes sub-categories which provided resolution on the broader categories in the upper portion of the sheet. All data on the counting sheets is actual raw count data based on whatever portion of the sample was processed. Total numbers of organisms per sample were calculated using the following equations (see below), and were entered in the Motile Epibenthos Full Screen Manager. Calculating the water filtered (estimated by flow meter readings) were calculated for subsequent calculations of organism concentrations (See Equation 2).

Equation 1: Total Organisms n = raw count

MF = Multiplication factor

Factor for sub-sampling

T = total organisms per sample

n X MF = T

Equation 2: Water Volume

RPT = flow meter

revolutions per tow

RPM = flow meter

calibration

A(m2) = Area of net mouth

(0.13 m2)

RPT/RPM x A(m2)= V(m3)

Other Data

1) From 1/20/81 - 1/9/82, length measurements (carapace and telson) were made of the isolated adult and juvenile caridean shrimps. Data were stored by species and computer statistical analyses (length regressions, means, etc.) performed. This information is on file.

2) Four years (1/20/81 - 1/4/85) of larval and juvenile fish lengths were recorded and stored by species and year in a separate data file and screen.

3) Decapod shrimp life history and developmental staging information was recorded on data sheets, on file by cruise/date and stored in a separate computer date file. These data were entered as numbers per sample.

4) Physical information taken after zpk sampling and before epibenthos sampling have been placed into a separate data file named: fauna.physical and is merged with the epi fauna counts.


Table Structure
Object Name:LTER.NIN.EPI.csv
Size:248000 byte
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Line Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 DateStationSample PeriodSAMTIMEReplicateSurface TemperatureBottom TemperatureMesh SizeSurface SalinityBottom SalinityNETSLEDFLOWNORevolutions per MeterDate CalibratedFlowmeter StartFlowmeter EndRevolutions per TowSPLITSMult, FactorVolumeHydromedusaeChaetognathsGastropodsBivalve LarvaeSTOMATOPUNIDSHRIACETESLUCIFERPERICLIMLATREUTEOTHASHRCRABMEGAPINNOTHEGAMAMPHCAPAMPHISOPODSCUMACEANMYSIDSFISHEGGSUNIDFLAROTHERSPALAELARALPHELARCALLILARUPOGELARPENAEPLAGOBYLARANCHOLARLEIOSLARSPECIES1SPECIES2SPECIES3SPECIES4SPECIES5SPECIES6SPECIES7
Column Name:DATE  
STATION  
SAMPLE  
Actual time  
REPLICAT  
STEMP  
BTEMP  
MESH  
SSAL  
BSAL  
Net/Sled  
Flowmeter no.  
RPM  
DATECAL  
FLOSTART  
FLOEND  
RPT  
Number of times the sample split  
XFACTOR  
NO3M  
HYDROMED  
CHAETOGN  
GASTROPO  
BIVALVES  
Stomatopods  
Unid. Shrimp larvae  
Acetes  
Lucifer  
Periclimenes  
Latreutes  
Other adult shrimp  
Crab Megalopae  
Pinnotherid juveniles  
Gammarid amphipods  
Caprellid amphipods  
Isopods  
Cumaceans  
Mysids  
Fish eggs  
Unid. fish larvae  
Other animals  
Palaemonetes larvae  
Alpheus larvae  
Callianassa larvae  
Upogebia larvae  
Penaeus postlarvae  
Goby larvae  
Anchoa larvae  
Leiostomus larvae  
Species #1  
Species #2  
Species #3  
Species #4  
Species #5  
Species #6  
Species #7  
Definition:Date when sample collectedStation where sample collectedSample periodActual timeReplicateSurface temperatureBottom temperatureMesh sizeSurface salinityBottom salinityNet/SledThe flowmeter Identification numberRevs/meterDate calibrated - date formatFlowmeter startFlowmeter endRevs/towNumber of times the sample splitMultiplication FactorNumber of cubic meters waterConcentration, density, number of Hydromedusae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Chaetognaths per cubic meter Condentration, density, number of Gastropods per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Bivalve Larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Stomatopods per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Unid. Shrimp larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Acetes per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Lucifer per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Periclimenes per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Latreutes per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Other adult shrimp per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Crab Megalopae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Pinnotherid juveniles per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Gammarid amphipods per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Caprellid amphipods per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Isopods per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Cumaceans per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Mysids per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Fish eggs per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Unid. fish larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Other animals per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Palaemonetes larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Alpheus larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Callianassa larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Upogebia larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Penaeus postlarvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Goby larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Anchoa larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Leiostomus larvae per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #1 per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #2 per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #3 per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #4 per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #5 per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #6 per cubic meterCondentration, density, number of Species #7 per cubic meter
Storage Type:date  
string  
integer  
time  
string  
float  
float  
integer  
float  
float  
string  
integer  
float  
string  
integer  
integer  
integer  
integer  
integer  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:dateTimenominalintervaldateTimenominalintervalintervalintervalratiorationominalintervalratiodateTimeintervalintervalratioratiointervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalintervalinterval
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeBB
DefinitionBread and Butter
Source
Code Definition
CodeDD
DefinitionDebidue
Source
Unitnumber
Precision1
Typewhole
Min1  
Max275 
Formathh:mm:ss
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeA
DefinitionA
Source
Code Definition
CodeB
DefinitionB
Source
Code Definition
CodeC
DefinitionC
Source
Unitcelsius
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min0  
Max50 
Unitcelsius
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min0  
Max50 
Unitmicrometer
Precision1
Typereal
Min365 
Max635 
UnitpartPerThousand
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max40 
UnitpartPerThousand
Precision0.1
Typereal
Min
Max40 
Definition Net / Sled. This is a constant field, with the S for Sled. Useless otherwise as a variable
Unitnumber
Precision1
Typewhole
Min1300  
Max6502 
UnitnumberPerMeter
Precision0.01
Typereal
Min20 
Max40 
FormatYYMMDD
Precision
Unitnumber
Precision1
Typewhole
Unitnumber
Precision1
Typewhole
Unitnumber
Precision1
Typereal
Min
Max413305 
Unitdimensionless
Precision1
Typereal
Min
Max
Unitnumber
Precision1
Typereal
Min
Max10 
UnitcubicMeter
Precision0.01
Typereal
Min
Max50 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max90 
Unitdimensionless
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max190 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max30 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max96 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max52 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max15 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max20 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max30 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max175 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max55 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max270 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max30 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max1170 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max11 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max270 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max40 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max40 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max50 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max15 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max15 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max260 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max15 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max15 
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
UnitnumberPerMeterCubed
Precision0.001
Typereal
Min
Max
Missing Value Code:          
Code-99.9
Explmissing value
Code-99.9
Explmissing value
Code-99.9
Explmissing value
Code-99.9
Explmissing value
Code-99.9
Explmissing value
                                                                                           
Accuracy Report:                                                                                                                
Accuracy Assessment:                                                                                                                
Coverage:                                                                                                                
Methods:                                                                                                                

Data Package Usage Rights

LTER Network Data Access Requirements

The access to all LTER data is subject to requirements set forth by this policy document to enable data providers to track usage, evaluate its impact in the community, and confirm users' acceptance of the terms of acceptable use. These requirements are standardized across the LTER Network to provide contractual exchange of data between Site Data Providers, Network Data Providers, and Data Users that can be encoded into electronic form and exchanged between computers. This will allow direct access to data via a common portal once these requirements have been fulfilled. The following information may be required directly or by proxy prior to the transference of any data object:

  • Registration
    • Name
    • Affiliation
    • Email address
    • Full Contact Info
  • Acceptance of the General Public Use Agreement or Restricted Data Use Agreement, as applicable
  • A Statement of Intended Use that is compliant with the above agreements. Such statements may be made submitted explicitly or made implicitly via the data access portal interface.

Conditions of Data Use

The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. Permission to use this dataset is granted to the Data User free of charge subject to the following terms:

  • Acceptable Use. Use of the dataset will be restricted to academic, research, educational, government, recreational, or other not-for-profit professional purposes. The Data User is permitted to produce and distribute derived works from this dataset provided that they are released under the same license terms as those accompanying this Data Set. Any other uses for the Data Set or its derived products will require explicit permission from the dataset owner.
  • Redistribution. The data are provided for use by the Data User. The metadata and this license must accompany all copies made and be available to all users of this Data Set. The Data User will not redistribute the original Data Set beyond this collaboration sphere.
  • Citation. It is considered a matter of professional ethics to acknowledge the work of other scientists. Thus, the Data User will properly cite the Data Set in any publications or in the metadata of any derived data products that were produced using the Data Set. Citation should take the following general form: Creator, Year of Data Publication, Title of Dataset, Publisher, Dataset identifier.
  • Acknowledgement. The Data User should acknowledge any institutional support or specific funding awards referenced in the metadata accompanying this dataset in any publications where the Data Set contributed significantly to its content. Acknowledgements should identify the supporting party, the party that received the support, and any identifying information such as grant numbers.
  • Notification. The Data User will notify the Data Set Contact when any derivative work or publication based on or derived from the Data Set is distributed. The Data User will provide the data contact with two reprints of any publications resulting from use of the Data Set and will provide copies, or on-line access to, any derived digital products. Notification will include an explanation of how the Data Set was used to produce the derived work.
  • Collaboration. The Data Set has been released in the spirit of open scientific collaboration. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator.
By accepting this Data Set, the Data User agrees to abide by the terms of this agreement. The Data Owner shall have the right to terminate this agreement immediately by written notice upon the Data User's breach of, or non-compliance with, any of its terms. The Data User may be held responsible for any misuse that is caused or encouraged by the Data User's failure to abide by the terms of this agreement.

Disclaimer

While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
(No thesaurus)North Inlet Estuary, Baruch Institute, Georgetown, South Carolina
LTER controlled vocabularyepibenthos, estuarine, ecosystem, zooplankton, population dynamics
LTER core research areaspopulations

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation, and/or protocols apply to the data table epibenthos-NIN-LTER-1981-1992:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Experimental Design

Since previous field studies indicated that stage of tide and time of day affected organism abundance at the epibenthic sled stations, it was necessary to make collections about every 14 days when the same tide stage occurs at the same time of day to keep these variables "constant". Thus, three sequential tows were made with the same apparatus along the same tow path when the end of the ebbing tide occurred near noon. Replicated biweekly measurements were made to allow for statistical comparisons of means among dates. Comparisons of abundance between years provided information on long term trends. Collections at a sandy inlet and a major marsh creek location allowed for a comparison of two habitat types. The same gear, field deployment, and tow paths have been used since sample no. 1.

Research Methods

Field Collection

A series of three sequential tows were made at each of 2 stations at two week intervals 2 1/2 hours prior to low tide. All collections were made during the late morning (9 - 11 am) hours. An epibenthic sled (see description) was towed behind an outboard boat motoring approximately 2 knots faster than the ebbing tidal current. All tows were made moving with the tidal flow along a marked tow path 100 m in length. Tows usually lasted approx. 5 minutes depending upon tidal velocity. Volume of water filtered was estimated with a torpedo shaped General Oceanics flow meter model 2040 mounted in the mouth of the net. Flow meter readings are recorded before and after each tow. Upon sample retrieval, the contents of the net were concentrated in the removable cod end and transferred into pre-labeled Nalgene jars and 100% buffered formalin stained with Rose Bengal added to bring the final concentration to 5 - 10% formalin. In the event of a large catch of sponge, algae, shell, or an oversized organism (greater than or equal to 1 liter volume), the sample was poured into a bucket and the excess material rinsed, noted, and discarded. The remaining sample was then sieved through a fine mesh net (less than or equal to 365 micron), placed in a pre-labeled jar, and preserved. Samples were returned to the lab for analysis.

Gear Description

Epibenthic Sled:

The apparatus consists of a rectangular steel frame (51 X 30 cm) mounted on 3 skis which orient the mouth of a #2 (365 micron) Nitex, 1/2 m mouth diameter standard conical plankton net perpendicular to the creek bottom. The apparatus does not dig into the sediment, but does collect soft-bodied sessile invertebrates (sponges, bryozoans, etc.) in addition to small motile organisms within 30 cm of the bottom. A 12m tow rope tied to the leading point of the sled chassis allowed for the best contact between the skis and the bottom along most of the tow paths.

Lab Analysis

Prior to counting, the sample is sieved, rinsed with fresh water and the used formalin disposed. The rinsed sample is then placed in a graduated beaker and sample volume recorded. In the event the volume of settled material is excessive (greater than or equal to 100 ml) the sample is divided with a cylindrical splitting apparatus until a workable fraction is obtained (never less than 12.5% of original volume). Sorting is done under a binocular dissecting microscope at 60 - 120X. All organisms of appropriate size (greater than or equal to 365 micron) are enumerated. (See Epibenthos Sample Information sheet and "Epibenthos Full Screen Management Program" for a listing of common taxa and all taxa encountered , respectively.) During the first year (1/20/81-1/9/82), 100 of each species of mysids; decapod larvae, juveniles, and adults; cumaceans; stomatopods; isopods; fish eggs, larvae, and juveniles (up to 100 per species per replicate) and rare organisms were isolated. All isolated specimens were stored by appropriate taxon in labeled flint vials and preserved in 10% formalin buffered and stained with Rose Bengal. Vials were stored by station and cruise for future analysis and reference. From 1/21/84 - 1/4/85, up to 100 of each species of fish larvae were isolated from each station. The first 100 encountered in replicates A, B, or C were in label vials and stored until length measurements were made. Larvae were measured using vernier calipers for larger specimens (> or = 10mm) or an ocular micrometer for small specimens(less or equare to 10mm). Lengths were recorded to the nearest .1mm with the ocular micrometer. Following sorting and enumeration the counted sample was recombined with the unsorted portion, placed in a labeled 500 ml flint jar, preserved with a fresh, buffered and stained 10% formalin solution and stored for future reference.

Counts

Counting sheets underwent three revisions as we become more familiar with the taxa and their relative abundance/importance over time. Copies of counting sheets used during different periods are in this documentation. The original sheet was used through cruise no. 99 the end of the first 4 years. Notes on taxonomy and life history were written on these sheets for the record. A simplified sheet with fewer categories and no entry slots for life history stages/sex was used for cruises 100-145 to speed up processing tissue. When analysis of data showed that much was lost in lumping genera and species into more general categories, and when time became available, reprocessing of those samples was done to upgrade the data base. See item 25 for details. The final counting sheet (145-present) was consistent with the IBM full screen manager. It includes sub-categories which provided resolution on the broader categories in the upper portion of the sheet. All data on the counting sheets is actual raw count data based on whatever portion of the sample was processed. Total numbers of organisms per sample were calculated using the following equations (see below), and were entered in the Motile Epibenthos Full Screen Manager. Calculating the water filtered (estimated by flow meter readings) were calculated for subsequent calculations of organism concentrations (See Equation 2).

Equation 1: Total Organisms n = raw count

MF = Multiplication factor

Factor for sub-sampling

T = total organisms per sample

n X MF = T

Equation 2: Water Volume

RPT = flow meter

revolutions per tow

RPM = flow meter

calibration

A(m2) = Area of net mouth

(0.13 m2)

RPT/RPM x A(m2)= V(m3)

Other Data

1) From 1/20/81 - 1/9/82, length measurements (carapace and telson) were made of the isolated adult and juvenile caridean shrimps. Data were stored by species and computer statistical analyses (length regressions, means, etc.) performed. This information is on file.

2) Four years (1/20/81 - 1/4/85) of larval and juvenile fish lengths were recorded and stored by species and year in a separate data file and screen.

3) Decapod shrimp life history and developmental staging information was recorded on data sheets, on file by cruise/date and stored in a separate computer date file. These data were entered as numbers per sample.

4) Physical information taken after zpk sampling and before epibenthos sampling have been placed into a separate data file named: fauna.physical and is merged with the epi fauna counts.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:LTER Network Office
Address:
UNM Biology Department, MSC03-2020,
1 University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 USA
Phone:
505 277 2535 (voice)
Phone:
505 277 2541 (fax)
Email Address:
tech-support@lternet.edu
Web Address:
http://www.lternet.edu
Creators:
Individual:Dr. Dennis Allen
Contacts:
Position:Information Manager
Organization:LTER Network Office
Address:
UNM Biology Department, MSC03-2020,
1 University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 USA
Phone:
505 277-2535 (voice)
Phone:
505 277-2541 (fax)
Email Address:
tech-support@lternet.edu
Web Address:
http://www.lternet.edu
Position:Information Manager
Organization:LTER Network Office
Address:
UNM Biology Department, MSC03-2020,
1 University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 USA
Phone:
505 277 2535 (voice)
Phone:
505 277 2541 (fax)
Email Address:
tech-support@lternet.edu
Web Address:
http://www.lternet.edu
Metadata Providers:
Organization:LTER Network Office
Address:
UNM Biology Department, MSC03-2020,
1 University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 USA
Phone:
505 277 2535 (voice)
Phone:
505 277 2541 (fax)
Email Address:
tech-support@lternet.edu
Web Address:
http://www.lternet.edu

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1981-01-12
End:
1992-01-17
Geographic Region:
Description:The North Inlet Estuary is located on the southeastern coast of the United States, approximately 10 kilometers east of Georgetown, South Carolina. The North Inlet Estuary is a bar-built Class C type estuary (Pritchard, 1955) and is a relatively small tidal estuary (area = 2630 hectares). It is composed of numerous winding tidal creeks dominated by Spartina alterniflora and is considered a pristine tidal estuary due to minimal anthropogenic impacts. The watershed drains a 24.8 square kilometer area of mostly pine forest and a moderately developed residential watershed to the north. Town Creek is a high salinity creek dominated by semi-diurnal tides. Rain input, primarily runoff, depresses salinities briefly (hours - days) depending on duration and frequency. Water temperatures mirror local air conditions: warm temperate. The DD (Debidue) site near Town Creek mouth and the Inlet is characterized by a high energy sandy bottom with regular ridges and swales. Depth along the tow path averaged 3 to 4 meters at sampling time. The bottom is sand with little or no hard substrate (shell, rock). Seasonal growths of bryozoan and algae occur. Generally, little or no organic matter is collected in the epibenthic sled. The DD epibenthos tow path site was located at the confluence of Town Creek and Debidue Creek. The 100 m tow path followed a transect beginning at a fixed point on Debidue Island and followed the shoreline due south (approximately 5 meters from shore) in line with a large, heavily-vegetated dune on North Island. The tow path terminated on a line with the boilers of a sunken ship and the tip of Debidue Island (looking to the NE). Each tow lasted approximately 5 minutes depending on tidal velocity. The BB (Bread and Butter) site is located along Town Creek approximately 2 km from the inlet mouth. At this location the creek is bounded by extensive Spartina alterniflora marshes. The intertidal zone is covered by clusters of the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), shell rubble and intermittent muddy flats. The bottom supports seasonal growths of sponges, algae, hydroids, bryozoans, and soft corals, as well as, oysters. Much of the bottom habitat is sandy mud covered by varying accumulations of detrital plant and fecal material. Depth along the tow path ranges from 2 to 4 meters at sampling time. The BB epibenthos tow path site is located along the western shoreline of Town Creek adjacent to the mouth of Clambank Creek. Each of the tows began at a small (1 m wide) drainage creek about 50m south of Clambank Creek confluence. The tow was started about 5 m from the edge of the marsh and ended about 30 m from the edge of the marsh. The tow path extended to a line between the Clambank tower and the first small drainage southwest of Boze's Creek mouth. Each tow lasted approximately 5 minutes depending upon tidal velocity.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.357Southern:  33.2125
Western:  -79.2936Eastern:  -79.1042

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to Data Table: epibenthos-NIN-LTER-1981-1992


Time Period
Begin:
1981-01-12
End:
1992-01-17
Geographic Region:
Description:The North Inlet Estuary is located on the southeastern coast of the United States, approximately 10 kilometers east of Georgetown, South Carolina. The North Inlet Estuary is a bar-built Class C type estuary (Pritchard, 1955) and is a relatively small tidal estuary (area = 2630 hectares). It is composed of numerous winding tidal creeks dominated by Spartina alterniflora and is considered a pristine tidal estuary due to minimal anthropogenic impacts. The watershed drains a 24.8 square kilometer area of mostly pine forest and a moderately developed residential watershed to the north. Town Creek is a high salinity creek dominated by semi-diurnal tides. Rain input, primarily runoff, depresses salinities briefly (hours - days) depending on duration and frequency. Water temperatures mirror local air conditions: warm temperate. The DD (Debidue) site near Town Creek mouth and the Inlet is characterized by a high energy sandy bottom with regular ridges and swales. Depth along the tow path averaged 3 to 4 meters at sampling time. The bottom is sand with little or no hard substrate (shell, rock). Seasonal growths of bryozoan and algae occur. Generally, little or no organic matter is collected in the epibenthic sled. The DD epibenthos tow path site was located at the confluence of Town Creek and Debidue Creek. The 100 m tow path followed a transect beginning at a fixed point on Debidue Island and followed the shoreline due south (approximately 5 meters from shore) in line with a large, heavily-vegetated dune on North Island. The tow path terminated on a line with the boilers of a sunken ship and the tip of Debidue Island (looking to the NE). Each tow lasted approximately 5 minutes depending on tidal velocity. The BB (Bread and Butter) site is located along Town Creek approximately 2 km from the inlet mouth. At this location the creek is bounded by extensive Spartina alterniflora marshes. The intertidal zone is covered by clusters of the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), shell rubble and intermittent muddy flats. The bottom supports seasonal growths of sponges, algae, hydroids, bryozoans, and soft corals, as well as, oysters. Much of the bottom habitat is sandy mud covered by varying accumulations of detrital plant and fecal material. Depth along the tow path ranges from 2 to 4 meters at sampling time. The BB epibenthos tow path site is located along the western shoreline of Town Creek adjacent to the mouth of Clambank Creek. Each of the tows began at a small (1 m wide) drainage creek about 50m south of Clambank Creek confluence. The tow was started about 5 m from the edge of the marsh and ended about 30 m from the edge of the marsh. The tow path extended to a line between the Clambank tower and the first small drainage southwest of Boze's Creek mouth. Each tow lasted approximately 5 minutes depending upon tidal velocity.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.357Southern:  33.2125
Western:  -79.2936Eastern:  -79.1042

Project

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:

Entry verification

Multiple levels of entry verification are performed. Data were initially checked for entry errors by Beth Thomas (the data management assistant) who originally entered the data on the full-screen management entry programs. Once all data entry errors were corrected, hard copies of the data on the system were sent to Lynn Barker (the Research Specialist who counted the samples) to proof against the original raw data sheets. All data on the system from samples 1-99 have been certified error-free by Lynn Barker (date 3-28-86). Samples 100-245 were entered by Jan Blakely. Ginger Ogburn-Mathews.

Date of last update while at North Inlet LTER

January 12, 1992.

Last modification at LTER Network Office

Individual data files (LTER.NIN.EPI.1981.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1982.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1983.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1984.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1985.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1986.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1987.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1988.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1989.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1990.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1991.txt, LTER.NIN.EPI.1992.txt) were concatenated into a single file spanning the dates from 1981 to 1992. Original fixed column format was changed to comma separated value format. These changes occured in March 2012

Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:unitList')
        |     |     |  \___attribute 'schemaLocation' in ns 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' ('xsi:schemaLocation') = 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1 http://nis.lternet.edu/schemas/eml/eml-2.1.0/stmml.xsd'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:unit')
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = 'ppt'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'constantToSI' = '0'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'partPerThousand'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '0.001'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'partPerThousand'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'numberPerNumber'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'dimensionless'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:description')
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'ratio of two quantities as parts per thousand\n                        (1:1000)'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:unit')
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = 'm-1'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'constantToSI' = '0'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'numberPerMeter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '1'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'numberPerMeter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'numberPerMeter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'lengthCount'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description' in ns 'http://www.xml-cml.org/schema/stmml-1.1' ('stmml:description')
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'count per meter'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo